Top Posters
Since Sunday
I
3
p
2
w
2
y
2
J
2
Q
2
r
2
o
2
e
2
j
2
d
2
T
2
New Topic  
wddwdw wddwdw
wrote...
Posts: 337
6 years ago
Martin wins a car in a lottery. As he already owns a car, he decides to sell the new one to his friend Ted. While driving the car, Ted gets into a head-on collision with another car. Due to a defective Supplemental Restraint System (SRS) in the vehicle, the airbag does not deploy and Ted is seriously injured. Which of the following statements is true of this situation?
A) Martin can be held strictly liable because he sold the car to Ted.
B) The car manufacturer cannot be held strictly liable as Ted had not bought the car from it.
C) Martin cannot be held strictly liable as the sale of the car counts as a casual transaction.
D) The driver of the other car can be held strictly liable due to his or her involvement in the accident.
Read 121 times
2 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
maxinemathismaxinemathis
wrote...
Posts: 198
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

wddwdw Author
wrote...
6 years ago
Genius!!!!!!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1634 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 345
  
 414
  
 779
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 437

Previous poll results: Who's your favorite biologist?