× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
y
2
m
2
m
2
u
2
m
2
B
2
M
2
e
2
k
2
N
2
y
2
m
2
New Topic  
Coco Coco
wrote...
Posts: 714
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
The new anti-bribery prosecution regime involves serious charges and penalties for bribery in foreign countries during past times when many people were bribing in the normal course of international business, and penalties were not levied. Is it unreasonable to levy extremely high fines at the beginning of the new regime, and/or not to limit the period over which bribery can trigger those fines? Why and why not?
Read 64 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
Reasons supporting high fines at the start:
 Sends a strong message to leave no doubt of the risks of bribery
 Encourages ethical behavior on questionable actions before they become illegal
 Low fines may be considered a cost of doing business, and produce no change in behavior.
 Low fines could send a signal that the new anti-bribery regime is not considered high priority for investigators, so they may turn to more important areas.
 New laws and/or more rigorous enforcement of existing laws do not happen without some public debate or notification.
 More revenue for the government.
Reasons against high fines at the start:
 Unfair to levy high fines on unsuspecting companies
 Companies need time to change policies and practices
 Companies will lose business to competitors who bribe if the cost of bribery gets too high.
Conclusion  High fines are probably reasonable
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  431 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 609
  
 1208
  
 1675
Your Opinion
How often do you eat-out per week?
Votes: 81

Previous poll results: Do you believe in global warming?