× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
1
a
1
New Topic  
roxann724 roxann724
wrote...
Posts: 320
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
A client is prescribed a chemotherapeutic drug for treatment of leukemia and asks the nurse why a drug that can also cause cancer is being used to treat cancer. Which response by the nurse is the most appropriate?
 
  1. The incidence of carcinogenic effects is really quite small, and you shouldn't be concerned about it.
  2. Since you are receiving such potent drugs, they have to warn of you of every possible side effect.
  3. The risk for causing another cancer is there, but sometimes the benefit of the treatment outweighs the risks.
  4. The carcinogenic effects often do not show up for a few decades, and we want to cure this leukemia now.
Read 66 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
Correct Answer: 3
Rationale 1: The incidence of carcinogenic drugs differs among drugs and is not always predictable.
Rationale 2: This response does not answer the client's question.
Rationale 3: The benefits of treatment sometimes do outweigh the risks; this provides an honest answer to the client.
Rationale 4: Although carcinogenic effects often do not show up for 20 or more years, this is not the best explanation.
Global Rationale: The benefits of treatment sometimes do outweigh the risks; this provides an honest answer to the client. The incidence of carcinogenic drugs differs among drugs and is not always predictable. Telling the client that receiving potent drugs warrants a warning does not answer the client's question. Although carcinogenic effects often do not show up for 20 or more years, this is not the best explanation.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1104 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 441
  
 324
  
 336
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 45
Closes: November 4