× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
o
5
5
b
4
s
3
j
3
b
3
m
3
K
3
g
3
L
3
w
3
m
3
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business
New Topic  
helpmepleaseee helpmepleaseee
wrote...
Posts: 535
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Did the court agree with Jutla's contention that the Supreme Court's Hoffman Plastics decision precluded the plaintiff from bringing the FLSA and retaliation lawsuit against it?
Read 48 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
#1
6 years ago
Hoffman eliminated back pay as a remedy to undocumented workers. That is, undocumented workers are not entitled to pay for time lost after their termination. The plaintiff Singh did not seek back pay. Rather, he sought and received an award covering unpaid wages for nearly three years. This fact pattern was not before the Supreme Court in Hoffman.
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1042 People Browsing
 110 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 882
  
 623
  
 308
Your Opinion
Where do you get your textbooks?
Votes: 447
Previous poll results: Who's your favorite biologist?