× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
I
3
p
2
w
2
y
2
J
2
Q
2
r
2
o
2
e
2
j
2
d
2
T
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
tnvalerio tnvalerio
wrote...
Posts: 633
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Was Benko's remark that the plaintiff would probably not get the job when the plaintiff revealed her age sufficient evidence for a jury to find that the defendant's stated reasons served as a pretext to hide a discriminatory practice?
Read 44 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
#1
6 years ago
No. The remark was too temporally and situationally distant from the actual hiring decision to be seen as strong evidence of the employer's practice or attitude. It was an offhanded remark of a supervisor with no demonstrated role in the promotion process.
tnvalerio Author
wrote...
#2
6 years ago
Slightly Frowning Face Still concerned about the others, I hope you can take a look at them
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1706 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 116
  
 641
  
 7536
Your Opinion
Who's your favorite biologist?
Votes: 608
Previous poll results: Does a gender wage gap exist in America?