× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
e
5
e
4
4
d
4
R
4
o
3
p
3
t
3
3
m
3
p
3
m
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Ptelwa Ptelwa
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 560
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Liesl purchased an insurance policy on her house. The policy stated that the insurance company was not liable for any damage to her house caused by vandalism or burglary. After Liesl's house had been vacant for more than 30 days, an arsonist burned it down. Is the insurance company liable?
 a. No, because arson is a form of vandalism.
  b. Yes, because arson is not a form of vandalism.
  c. No, because the language is ambiguous and should be interpreted against the insurance company.
  d. Yes, because the language is vague and should be interpreted against Liesl.
Read 72 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
tdubb1992tdubb1992
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1171
Rep: 10 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Ptelwa Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Brilliant ツ
Lawson1981
wrote...

Yesterday
Smart ... Thanks!
Hellish Lover
wrote...

2 hours ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  970 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 314
  
 2400
  
 263
Your Opinion
Where do you get your textbooks?
Votes: 422
Previous poll results: Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?