× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
New Topic  
aubree98 aubree98
wrote...
Posts: 316
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Liability of Limited Partners. Robert Pitman was one of two limited partners in Ramsey Homebuilders, a limited partnership that engaged in the business of residential construction. Michael Ramsey was the sole general partner in the partnership. Because Ramsey had a poor credit history, he was unable to borrow the money or obtain the credit needed to sustain the partnership's business. Pitman, who had a personal account with Flanagan Lumber Co, contacted Flanagan's credit manager and secured an account in the partnership's name. After the partnership failed to pay the account, Flanagan sued Pitman, alleging that although Pitman was a limited partner in Ramsey Homebuilders, he was responsible for the partnership's debt under RULPA 303. Pitman argued that, if anything, he was operating within the waters of the safe harbor provided by RULPA 303(b)(3), which states that a limited partner does not participate in the control of the partnership solely by acting as a surety or guarantor for any liabilities incurred by the partnership. Can Pitman be held liable for the partnership's debt to Flanagan?
Read 59 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
WanzamriWanzamri
wrote...
Posts: 220
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
This verified answer contains over 190 words.
1

Related Topics

aubree98 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Smart ... Thanks!
wrote...

Yesterday
Brilliant
wrote...

2 hours ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1297 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 670
  
 654
  
 1335
Your Opinion
Which of the following is the best resource to supplement your studies:
Votes: 292