× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
New Topic  
musicall musicall
wrote...
Posts: 586
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Import Control. In 1996, the International Trade Administration (ITA) of the U.S. De-partment of Commerce assessed antidumping duties against Koyo Seiko Co, NTN Corp, and other companies, on certain tapered roller bearings and their components imported from Japan. In assessing these duties, the ITA requested information from the makers about their home market sales. NTN responded in part that its figures should not include many sample and small-quantity sales, which were made to enable customers to decide whether to buy the products. NTN provided no evidence to support this assertion, however. In calculating the fair market value of the bearings in Japan, the ITA determined, among other things, that sample and small-quantity sales were within the makers' ordinary course of trade. Koyo and others appealed these assessments to the U.S. Court of International Trade. NTN objected in part to the ITA's inclusion of sample and small-quantity sales. On what basis should the ITA make such determinations? Should the court order the ITA to recalculate its assessment on the basis of NTN's objection? Explain.
Read 42 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
sweetpeajezzysweetpeajezzy
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1115
Rep: 6 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
This verified answer contains over 260 words.
1

Related Topics

musicall Author
wrote...

6 years ago
this is exactly what I needed
wrote...

Yesterday
Correct Slight Smile TY
wrote...

2 hours ago
This site is awesome
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1320 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 343
  
 321
  
 1135
Your Opinion
Where do you get your textbooks?
Votes: 372