× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
p
4
h
4
c
4
d
3
3
c
3
t
3
u
3
A
3
B
3
j
3
s
3
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business
New Topic  
jreichert1033 jreichert1033
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 566
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Commercial Impracticability. E+E (US) Inc, Manley Regan Chemicals Division, agreed to sell to Rockland Industries, Inc, three containers of antimony oxide for 1.80 per pound. At the time, both parties knew that there was a global shortage of the chemical, that prices were rising, and that Manley Regan would obtain its supply from GFI Chemicals, Inc When GFI could not deliver, Manley-Regan told Rockland that it could not fulfill the contract. Rockland bought an equivalent amount of the chemical elsewhere at an increased price and filed a suit in a federal district court against Manley-Regan to recover the difference between the cost of the substitute chemicals and the contract price. Manley Regan argued that the failure of delivery by GFI, its sole source for the oxide, excused its failure to perform on the ground of commercial impracticability. Will the court agree? Why or why not?
Read 32 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
whitneyracquelwhitneyracquel
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1166
Rep: 10 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
This verified answer contains over 260 words.
1

Related Topics

jreichert1033 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks
nsak
wrote...

Yesterday
Smart ... Thanks!
kc123
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks for your help!!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1153 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 350
  
 361
  
 106
Your Opinion
Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?
Votes: 820
Previous poll results: What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?