× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
t
7
m
6
k
6
F
5
j
5
t
5
j
5
G
5
f
5
a
5
d
5
c
5
New Topic  
ashley0024 ashley0024
wrote...
Posts: 570
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In City of Livonia Employees Retirement System v. Boeing Co, City sued Boeing on behalf of all persons who bought Boeing stock in a certain time period on the basis that the company was overly optimistic about the time schedule for the new 787 aircraft. When problems with the plane developed, the stock fell ten percent. Suit claimed that company executives made false statements about the plane, so committed securities fraud. The appeals court held that Boeing was:
 a. liable for securities fraud because the reports about the plane were not sufficiently identified as a forward- looking statement
  b. not liable for securities fraud because the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act requires that plaintiffsdemonstrate fraud in company statements, which did not happen
 c. Not liable for securities fraud because there is no evidence Boeing knew of the problems in advance d. American Express was liable for all damages due to its overly optimistic statements
  e. American Express was liable for securities fraud because it did not have a separate section of the report that identified it as a forward looking statement
Read 78 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
ortiz311ortiz311
wrote...
Posts: 239
Rep: 5 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

ashley0024 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1029 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 149
  
 264
  
 231