× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
3
w
3
e
3
3
r
3
b
2
M
2
V
2
f
2
c
2
c
2
K
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Ptelwa Ptelwa
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 560
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, a maker of leather goods would not sell to stores that would not follow its pricing policy (resale price maintenance). The Supreme Court held that:
 a. all vertical price fixing subject to a per se rule of illegality
  b. vertical price restraints would be viewed under a rule of reason
  c. vertical price restraints injure the ability of sellers to compete so are generally illegal d. vertical price fixing of minimum prices is subject to a per se rule of illegality
  e. none of the other choices
Read 55 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
mngfmngf
wrote...
#1
Posts: 435
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Ptelwa Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
Starfiew
wrote...

Yesterday
This site is awesome
jodie1
wrote...

2 hours ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  525 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 303
  
 301
  
 333
Your Opinion
Which industry do you think artificial intelligence (AI) will impact the most?
Votes: 486
Previous poll results: Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?