× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
s
3
v
3
p
3
m
2
s
2
d
2
N
2
d
2
e
2
s
2
s
2
e
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Ptelwa Ptelwa
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 560
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, a maker of leather goods would not sell to stores that would not follow its pricing policy (resale price maintenance). The Supreme Court held that:
 a. all vertical price fixing subject to a per se rule of illegality
  b. vertical price restraints would be viewed under a rule of reason
  c. vertical price restraints injure the ability of sellers to compete so are generally illegal d. vertical price fixing of minimum prices is subject to a per se rule of illegality
  e. none of the other choices
Read 47 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
mngfmngf
wrote...
#1
Posts: 435
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Ptelwa Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Brilliant ツ
Gamiung3657
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
gmiannotti
wrote...

2 hours ago
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1020 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 3586
  
 257
  
 297
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 488
Previous poll results: Where do you get your textbooks?