× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
e
4
h
4
h
4
m
3
d
3
B
3
o
3
w
3
H
3
a
3
c
3
k
3
New Topic  
tfarone1989 tfarone1989
wrote...
Posts: 337
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
17-year-old Robert purchased a car from King that was later destroyed by fire. Robert sued to recover the price of the car. The court would hold that:
 a. no contract existed; Robert relied on King to his detriment
  b. no contract existed because Robert is too young to enter into a contract; his parents are parties to the contract
  c. a contract existed, but Robert was a minor and so could disaffirm the contract and get a full refund
  d. a contract existed, but the uneven bargaining positions of the parties allowed the court to render the contract void as in violation of public policy
  e. none of the other choices
Read 56 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
breohbreoh
wrote...
Posts: 449
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

tfarone1989 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1188 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 298
  
 504
  
 254
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 436

Previous poll results: What's your favorite coffee beverage?