× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Vaneisha07 Vaneisha07
wrote...
Posts: 530
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In U.S. v. Yang, Yang was accused of bribing a company employee to buy confidential information. The appeals court held that:
 a. the intent to steal trade secrets was all that was necessary to convict Yang b. more than intent to steal trade secrets was necessary to convict Yang
  c. Yang did not understand U.S. laws and so could not be convicted
  d. the Economic Espionage Act does not apply to international companies e. none of the other choices are correct
Read 54 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
al
wrote...
#1
6 years ago
a
Vaneisha07 Author
wrote...
#2
6 years ago
White Checkmark Marking this solved
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1258 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 263
  
 510
  
 302
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 370
Previous poll results: Which industry do you think artificial intelligence (AI) will impact the most?