× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
may129 may129
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 624
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
No Gordo is a common artificial sweetener. Researchers find it is responsible for cancer of the liver in some people. A person with liver cancer, who has eaten products containing No Gordo for years, wants to sue manufacturers who used the sweetener. In this case:
 a. there is no one to sue since No Gordo is not patented and is used in many products
  b. there is an assumption of the risk by consumers of such chemical products, so there is no liability c. he may sue in strict liability for unknown hazards against all makers of No Gordo
  d. there may be a suit in negligence against all makers of No Gordo for failure to adequately test the product e. there may be a suit for intentional liability under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Read 40 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
vbassvbass
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1133
Rep: 5 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

may129 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Brilliant ツ
klyn
wrote...

Yesterday
Good timing, thanks!
Loruiz15
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1213 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 1480
  
 353
  
 274
Your Opinion
What's your favorite coffee beverage?
Votes: 274
Previous poll results: Which industry do you think artificial intelligence (AI) will impact the most?