In Paramount Contracting Co v. DPS Industries, DPS claimed there was a contract to deliver hundreds ...

In Paramount Contracting Co v. DPS Industries, DPS claimed there was a contract to deliver hundreds of truckloads of dirt for Paramount, which claimed no contract had come into existence. The courts held that:
 a. the contract fell under the common law and no contract existed because there was no meeting of the minds b. the contract fell under the common law and the terms were sufficiently clear for a binding contract to havebeen formed
 c. the contract fell under Article 2 of the UCC and the court would determine the price for the dirt as it was clear the parties intended to deal with each other
  d. the contract fell under Article 2 of the UCC as it was a contract for goods and Paramount breached the contract
  e. none of the other choices are correct