× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
3
w
3
e
3
3
r
3
2
b
2
M
2
V
2
f
2
c
2
c
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
Irrelevantshine Irrelevantshine
wrote...
Posts: 651
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Sowers v. Forest Hills Subdivision, Sowers wanted to build a wind turbine to generate electricity. His neighbors opposed the construction and took Sowers to court. The Nevada high court held that:
 a. the turbine was a nuisance
  b. the turbine was not a nuisance
  c. the turbine cast a shadow on neighbor's land, which was a trespass
  d. the turbine could be built only if surplus electricity from it was credited to neighbors who otherwise would receive no benefit from it
  e. none of the other choices are correct
Read 42 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
#1
6 years ago
a
wrote...
#2
6 years ago
Confirmed correct
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1264 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 323
  
 252
  
 311
Your Opinion
Which country would you like to visit for its food?
Votes: 263
Previous poll results: Do you believe in global warming?