× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
s
5
g
5
K
5
o
5
g
5
o
4
k
4
s
4
I
4
k
4
j
4
o
4
New Topic  
mvillekid20 mvillekid20
wrote...
Posts: 332
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In U.S. v. Young, where government agents put Federal Express packages to Young under an x-ray to look at the contents, and he was convicted partly based on that evidence, the appeals court held that:
 a. the conviction was overturned because there was no warrant to x-ray the packages
  b. the conviction was overturned because Federal Express violated customer privacy rights
  c. the conviction was upheld because the severity of the crime outweighed the usual requirement to obtain a warrant
  d. the conviction was upheld because there was no need for a warrant e. none of the other choices
Read 47 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
kmoralessskmoralesss
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1086
Rep: 4 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

mvillekid20 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Helped a lot
wrote...

Yesterday
this is exactly what I needed
wrote...

2 hours ago
Good timing, thanks!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  960 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 432
  
 313
  
 837
Your Opinion
What's your favorite coffee beverage?
Votes: 299

Previous poll results: Who's your favorite biologist?