The Supreme Court in Hughes v. Oklahoma held that states have compelling interests in protecting ...

zainwadi

wrote...

Go to Answer

Posts: 320

Rep:

6 years ago

The Supreme Court in Hughes v. Oklahoma held that states have compelling interests in protecting ...

The Supreme Court in Hughes v. Oklahoma held that states have compelling interests in protecting natural resources and these interests supersede the Commerce Clause.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Read 24 times

1 Reply

Report

Replies

Answer verified by a subject expert

jenellyd

wrote...

Posts: 237

Rep:

6 years ago

Report

Related Topics

zainwadi Author

wrote...

6 years ago

Thanks

Jadakiss

wrote...

Yesterday

Thank you, thank you, thank you!

Hellish Lover

wrote...

2 hours ago

This site is awesome

New Topic

Quick Reply

Explore

Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers

1307 People Browsing

Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook

Related Images

218

429

337

Your Opinion

Previous poll results: Who will win the 2024 president election?

It's sore throat season, why does my mucus have red spots?

The Toxic Skin and Fungi Defense

Bonobos, Chimpanzees, and the 98% DNA Link

Strange Ingredients Lurking in Doritos Chips

Courses by Biology Forums

Ready to ask a question on Biology Forums? Try it out

Home Search Q & A Board Gallery Resource Library Blog Dictionary Chat	Quick Links Start a Topic Latest Topics Unanswered Questions Courses Study Tools Browse by Textbook	Social Facebook YouTube Community Stats Who's Online Trending Staff	Help About Us Take the Tour Study Tips Posting Guidelines Terms and Policies Contact Us
Biology Forums - Study Force © 2010-2024 \| Powered by SMF \| SMF © 2015, Simple Machines \| Sitemap Biology-Forums.com is not affiliated with any publisher. Book covers, title and author names appear for reference only.