× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
t
7
m
6
k
6
F
5
j
5
t
5
j
5
G
5
f
5
a
5
d
5
c
5
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
BrittneyABuell BrittneyABuell
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 659
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Phillip was waiting for a bus at a bus stop. Across the street and down the block, a mechanic negligently overinflated a tire he was intending to put onto Marsha's pickup truck. The exploding tire injured Marsha and frightened a neighborhood dog, which ran down the street and knocked Phillip down, injuring his knee. Phillip sued the mechanic. In applying the Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co decision to this case, Phillip would
 A) win because the mechanic was negligent in overinflating the tire, which led to Phillip's injury.
 B) win based on negligence per se.
 C) lose because the court would apply the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.
 D) lose because, although the mechanic's conduct was negligent toward Marsha, it was not a wrong in relation to Phillip, who was far away. The mechanic could not have foreseen injury to Phillip and therefore had no duty to him.
Read 53 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
CricooCricoo
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 665
Rep: 3 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

BrittneyABuell Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Brilliant ツ
TAT1238
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
big_larry_samp
wrote...

2 hours ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1091 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 214
  
 215
  
 304
Your Opinion
Who's your favorite biologist?
Votes: 587
Previous poll results: Which industry do you think artificial intelligence (AI) will impact the most?