× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
e
5
e
4
4
d
4
R
4
o
3
p
3
t
3
3
m
3
p
3
m
3
New Topic  
swaggymeggy swaggymeggy
wrote...
Posts: 782
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
A nurse manager has conducted a study to look at the relationship between the amount of time staff nurses on a unit spend in patient rooms and the number of times the patients on that unit use their call lights. The manager reports the results of the data analysis as r = 1.02. How should these results be interpreted?
 
  1. There is a strong positive relationship between the variables.
  2. There is a strong negative relationship between the variables.
  3. There is no relationship between the variables.
  4. This is an improbable value, and a mathematical error is possible.
Read 29 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
4
Rationale 1: A positive value indicates a positive correlation between the variables, and 1.02 falls outside the parameters of a correlation coefficient (1.0 and 1.0).
Rationale 2: A negative value does indicate a negative correlation between the variables, but 1.02 falls outside the parameters of a correlation coefficient (1.0 and 1.0).
Rationale 3: A relationship may exist, but this value lies outside the parameters of a correlation coefficient (1.0 and 1.0), so it is impossible to be certain.
Rationale 4: Correlation coefficients can only range between 1.0 and 1.0, so this is an improbable value. Perhaps a mathematical error was made.
Global Rationale:
swaggymeggy Author
wrote...
6 years ago
Thank you so much
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  964 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 955
  
 712
  
 343
Your Opinion