× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
stu.nehagupta stu.nehagupta
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 737
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
According to SCOTUS in Michigan v. Sitz (1990), involving sobriety checkpoints, detaining a car briefly at a sobriety checkpoint requires:
 
  a. reasonable suspicion that the driver is driving under the influence.
  b. probable cause that the driver is driving under the influence.
  c. clear and convincing evidence that the driver is driving under the influence.
  d. no individualized suspicion, because of the importance of the state's interest in addressing the drunk driving problem.
Read 40 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
tuluslutherstulusluthers
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 973
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

stu.nehagupta Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks for your help!!
jasonbourne
wrote...

Yesterday
Smart ... Thanks!
TAT1238
wrote...

2 hours ago
This calls for a celebration Person Raising Both Hands in Celebration
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1323 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 261
  
 101
  
 301