× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
valerie2500 valerie2500
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 730
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
According to the Supreme Court in Michigan v. Sitz, involving sobriety checkpoints, detaining a car briefly at a sobriety checkpoint requires:
 
  a. reasonable suspicion to think that the driver is driving under the influence.
  b. probable cause to think that the driver is driving under the influence.
  c. clear and convincing evidence to think that the driver is driving under the influence.
  d. no individualized suspicion because of the importance of the State's interest in addressing the drunk drivingproblem.
Read 50 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
virpal j.virpal j.
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 958
Rep: 5 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

valerie2500 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Brilliant ツ
kiara23247843
wrote...

Yesterday
Good timing, thanks!
shimyshiguy
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1286 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 141
  
 221
  
 1515
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 370
Previous poll results: What's your favorite coffee beverage?