In 2004, three separate U.S. Supreme Court rulings rejected the administration’s

In 2004, three separate U.S. Supreme Court rulings rejected the administration’s argument that the president has virtually unlimited power to hold enemy combatants at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, indefinitely without access to the courts and legal representation.  What would David Luban most likely think of this ruling?
a.    He would be in favor of it since it rejects of the administration’s hybrid war-law model which severely limits enemy combatants’ rights.
b.     He would be in favor of it because he believes that terrorism is justified against a greater power.
c.     He would be opposed to it since terrorist suspects, because of their intentions to kill noncombatants, give up all their rights under jus in bello.
d.     He would be opposed to it because he believes that the sovereign of a nation should have absolute power.