Liberal and constructivist theorists often look to the rules, norms, and institutions in the international system as an explanation for war and peace.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Military power is an important characteristic of states from a realist point of view, but states that are apparently weak seem to win a large share of armed conflicts. (a) How can we change our definition of military power to reflect this reality? (b) Are there other types of power that may be more important in predicting military victories? (c) Should states focus primarily on military power in their security decisions? Why?
What will be an ideal response?
Define unipolarity and multipolarity. Give an example of each. Which distribution of power do you think results in the most stable international system? Which do you think results in the most peaceful world? Explain your answer.
What will be an ideal response?
Compare old trends versus the new trends in military spending. How has military spending changed over time? What are the consequences?
What will be an ideal response?
The Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty seeks to prevent horizontal proliferation of nuclear weapons. Many countries reject the NPT as hypocritical as it denies them the same rights and capabilities that are afforded to the United States, Russia, China, Britain, and France. Analyze this argument. How can countries justify denying other countries nuclear weapons while they have no intention of giving up their own?
What will be an ideal response?