× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
7
n
3
j
3
o
2
x
2
c
2
2
p
2
n
2
3
2
C
2
z
2
New Topic  
ddbeaumont15 ddbeaumont15
wrote...
Posts: 685
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Suppose in one experiment in a series you found no difference in your participants' responses to the levels of your independent variable. You suspect that the levels you chose were too close together. So you redo the experiment with appropriate levels. It would be ethical to
 
  A) leave the first experiment out of a report if it adds nothing to the conclusion.
  B) report all results regardless of the outcome.
  C) change all results that do not fit the theory.
  D) report only the best experiment if no more than five experiments were done.



A general principle to follow to determine whether an action is scientifically ethical is to ask whether
 
  A) anything has been left out or anything added that is not entirely truthful.
  B) the action aids the efficient growth of the body of knowledge.
  C) the action will further your career.
  D) the action would pass an ethics committee.



Which of the activities listed below would the author classify as neat tricks?
 
  A) falsifying credentials
  B) piecemeal reporting
  C) reformulating theory
  D) all of the choices would be classified as neat tricks



You should publish the results from a series of experiments
 
  A) as one experiment at a time so that they get into the literature quickly.
  B) in as many separate journals as possible.
  C) as an integrated series.
  D) as a book.



Data can be eliminated from an experiment if
 
  A) responses to certain levels of the independent fail to support your hypothesis.
  B) responses fail to meet criteria established prior to the experiment.
  C) participants seem uncooperative.
  D) data should never be eliminated



In the book, the author called actions that are generally unacceptable but not outright scientific fraud questionable tricks. Which action did he identify as a questionable trick?
 
  A) fabricating data
  B) reorganizing experiments in a series when reporting them
  C) reformulating theories
  D) failing to meet the assumptions of a reported statistical test



Which of the activities listed below did the author classify as dirty tricks (highly unethical)?
 
  A) falsifying credentials
  B) reformulating theory
  C) omitting experiments from a report
  D) all of the choices are dirty tricks



You should keep raw data from a published experiment
 
  A) until you finish the data analysis.
  B) until the experiment is published.
  C) for a minimum of about 5 years following publication.
  D) forever.



It is ethical to fabricate experimental results
 
  A) only if all other alternatives have been considered.
  B) whenever the experimental design calls for it.
  C) if fewer than 20 of the data are missing.
  D) at no time.



You should always report the experiments you did in the order you did them even if it would be more logical to report them in a different order.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Read 35 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
thffd666thffd666
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 782
Rep: 7 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

ddbeaumont15 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This site is awesome
wrote...

Yesterday
Good timing, thanks!
wrote...

2 hours ago
Helped a lot
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  905 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 268
  
 133
  
 176
Your Opinion
Who's your favorite biologist?
Votes: 587