John and Martha entered into a prenuptial agreement with no intent of ever marrying, although they were cohabiting. When they broke up, Martha tried to enforce the agreement. A court would probably rule:
a. There was no contract because there was no consideration.
b. In Martha's favor because John voluntarily entered into the agreement and signed it.
c. In John's favor because he had most of the assets.
d. That it was enforceable as a quasi-contract.
Q. 2An emerging ADA issue is prescription medication addiction.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Q. 3Our client's fianc, while waiting for the chapel to fill with wedding guests, insisted that she sign a prenuptial agreement. He said that if she didn't sign, he was leaving. Reluctantly she signed, but the marriage didn't last long enough to let the ink dry on the document. The agreement made no support arrangements at all, and settled less than the cost of the wedding on her, a tiny fraction of what he was worth. We might challenge the prenup on the ground that:
a. She did not enter the agreement voluntarily.
b. They both signed the contract.
c. It was in writing.
d. The agreement was not unconscionable.
Q. 4A substantial physical or mental impairment occurs when one is significantly limited or restricted from life's major activities.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Q. 5Legal requirements for a valid premarital agreement include all but which of the following?
a. A clear assignment of household chores and responsibilities
b. The requirements necessary for any civil contract
c. Clauses that express the intent of the parties upon the termination of their marriage
d. That it be in writing
Quick Reply
