Hillary, a prostitute in New York, offers her services to Bertrand in exchange for 50. Bertrand agrees to pay her 50 in exchange for those services. Is this contract enforceable?
A) No, because the contract violates public policy despite the fact that there was an intent to contract and a valid offer, acceptance, and consideration.
B) Yes, because Bertrand's acceptance mirrored the terms of Hillary's offer.
C) No, because the services Hillary is offering are not valid consideration to bind Bertrand's promise.
D) Yes, because both parties had a intent to contract, and their promises constitute consideration.
Q. 2Companies should encourage using trade names as a verb to increase the popularity of the brand name.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Q. 3Which of the following results in a void contract, as opposed to voidable?
A) undue influence B) duress C) mutual mistake D) fraud
Q. 4In a trademark infringement action, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving that a likelihood of confusion exists.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Q. 5An online retailer can use the symbol once a trademark application has been filed with the USPTO.
a. True
b. False
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Quick Reply
