You may be aware of the organ trade tragedy in developing countries that poses a major threat to those individuals who reside in rural areas i.e. selling of kidneys for a small amount of money to pay off debts, living expenses. This situation is increasingly problematic in countries like india, Pakistan, Indonesia etc.
This article discusses kidney trade in a more ethical manner, the University of Pennsylvania and Philadelphia VA Medical centre tested and found that people earning over $110 000 a year were still willing to donate an organ as compared to individuals earning less than $20,000 per year. Both groups were offered $10,000 in compensation.
Given this situation, if there is a need for organ donors, and there are people willing to do so for money, should this be allowed? Do you think this is ethical? The article mentions that about 4,4000 people die waiting for matching organs in the U.S alone.
A new study seems to knock down some of the ethical objections to paying people to donate an organ. The study authors are with the University of Pennsylvania and the Philadelphia VA Medical Center.
The researchers studied people's willingness to donate a kidney with or without a cash incentive. Penn assistant professor Scott Halpern says his study suggests that financial incentives would increase the number of organs available for transplant without exploiting low-income people.
Halpern: Payments did not seem to influence the poor any more than they influenced the rich. Ten thousand dollars offered to people earning more than $100,000 a year didn't seem to have any different effect than that same $10,000 when offered to people earning less than $20,000 per year.
Nearly 84,000 people are waiting for a kidney transplant in the United States. Last year, a United Nations commission concluded that it would be very difficult to effectively regulate a kidney market, even in a prosperous country like the United States.
University of Pennsylvania bioethicist Arthur Caplan says creating a market for kidneys would cause too many problems. Caplan was not involved in the new study, but he served on a the U.N. commission that studied potential fixes to the worldwide organ shortage.
Caplan: It would take a lot of policing and oversight to make sure that people weren't getting their arms twisted to sell a kidney if they had gambling debts, or even by family members if somebody said: 'We've been good to you, so now you've got to pay us back.' The prospects for being able to regulate that were very poor.
Caplan says the United States should create a system that assumes everyone wants to be an organ donor and would force those who object to opt-out. Right now, the United States has an opt-in system.
Some ethicists worry that payment would blind donors to the health risks of giving up an organ, but Halpern says his study suggests that's not the case.
Halpern: We allow people to get paid to play in the NFL or to be workers in a coal mine or to be stunt doubles in a movie all the time. They take money in exchange for the risks. The risks of kidney donation are relatively small by comparison.
Each year, about 4,400 people in the United States die while waiting for a kidney.
Quick Reply
