Top Posters
Since Sunday
e
4
h
4
h
4
m
3
d
3
B
3
o
3
w
3
H
3
a
3
c
3
k
3
New Topic  
jaspinder kaur jaspinder kaur
wrote...
Posts: 509
5 years ago

A witness for the prosecution is introducing a tape recording that clearly implicates the person on trial in a crime. While the information is factual and accurate, and there is no doubt about where the recording came from, it is highly prejudicial to the suspect. On what grounds can the counsel for the defense get this evidence removed?



▸ The evidence is not authentic since it is prejudicial in nature.

▸ The tape recording is declared inadmissible since it is hearsay.

▸ Due to its prejudicial nature, the evidence is determined by the judge to be incompetent.

▸ The tape recording falls under the classification of privileged information and is thereby not admissible.
Textbook 
Digital Archaeology: The Art and Science of Digital Forensics

Digital Archaeology: The Art and Science of Digital Forensics


Edition: 1st
Author:
Read 100 times
2 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
peaceout3000peaceout3000
wrote...
Posts: 380
5 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

jaspinder k. Author
wrote...
5 years ago
Appreciate the effort, thank you!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1249 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 1323
  
 852
  
 2438
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 436