× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
j
4
m
4
4
n
3
m
3
R
3
V
3
e
3
w
3
j
3
a
3
a
3
New Topic  
colleen colleen
wrote...
Valued Member
Posts: 17076
12 years ago
Social scientists disagree on the role of evolution in accounting for the complex issue of courtship and mating.   How do sociobiologists explain these issues?  How do evolutionary psychologists differ in their explanations?  What basic issue divides evolutionary psychologists and their critics?
Read 847 times
1 Reply
Sunshine ☀ ☼

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
Valued Member
12 years ago
Sociobiologists say that evolution has shaped the different courting and mating strategies of males and females because males and females face different kinds of survival problems.
The different strategies used by males and females maximize their chances of passing on their genes.
Evolutionary psychologists generally agree, but consider analogies to nonhuman species to be simplistic and misleading and so rely less on comparisons with other species.
Critics argue that current evolutionary explanations of infidelity and monogamy are based on simplistic stereotypes of gender differences and that actual behavior of humans and other animals often fails to conform to the predictions of evolutionary psychologists.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  768 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 289
  
 201
  
 476
Your Opinion
Which industry do you think artificial intelligence (AI) will impact the most?
Votes: 405