× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
3
w
3
e
3
3
r
3
b
2
M
2
V
2
f
2
c
2
c
2
K
2
New Topic  
RibosomePoo RibosomePoo
wrote...
Posts: 9
Rep: 0 0
12 years ago
When a population is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the allele frequencies are not changing.

But look at this:

What about an example where disruptive selection favours homozygotes instead of heterozygotes, so the phenotypic frequencies change but the allele frequencies are the same.

Is the population in HWE?
Read 803 times
3 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
Educator
12 years ago
So, hypothetically, BB is favoured over Bb?
RibosomePoo Author
wrote...
12 years ago
So, hypothetically, BB is favoured over Bb?

Well, both homozygous frequencies are favoured over heterozygotes.

I just need confirming what HWE is. Does it occur when genotype frequencies change or allele frequencies?


Also, what is the difference between balancing selection and disruptive selection?
wrote...
Educator
12 years ago
Hardy-Weinberg is purely hypothetical. If a population does not undergo changes to their gene pools are not currently evolving – this state is called the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. However, populations rarely remain in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for long in nature, but the concept is useful because it gives us a baseline value to compare to if there is a change in the gene pool.

Natural selection, sexual selection, artificial selection, genetic drift, and gene flow disrupt the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.


New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  657 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 376
  
 195
  
 555
Your Opinion
What's your favorite math subject?
Votes: 559