Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Laboratory Help Referencing Help
New Topic  
Cremeux Cremeux
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 4510
Rep: 2 0
9 years ago
Which of the following is an example of an ex post facto fallacy?
A) Since A and B are related, you assume that A caused B.
B) Since the manipulation of the independent variable A results in a consistent change in the dependent variable B, you assume that the change in A causes the change in B.
C) Since no correlation between A and B is found, you assume that there is no causal relationship between A and B.
D) Since only a contingency between A and B is established, you assume that there is no causal connection between A and B.
Textbook 
Research Methods: A Process of Inquiry

Research Methods: A Process of Inquiry


Edition: 8th
Authors:
Read 267 times
3 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
stylezstylez
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 4397
Rep: 88 0
9 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

Cremeux Author
wrote...
#2
9 years ago
Excellent, what I needed. Respect
wrote...
#3
9 years ago
I was pretty confident with this, you're welcome.
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1330 People Browsing
 110 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 234
  
 4428
  
 790
Your Opinion
Where do you get your textbooks?
Votes: 372
Previous poll results: What's your favorite math subject?