× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
k
4
c
4
4
M
3
t
3
i
3
B
3
k
3
m
3
c
3
o
3
New Topic  
noah_1w noah_1w
wrote...
Posts: 1
Rep: 0 0
9 years ago
Why did Hubble have to rely on Cepheids to find the distance to M31, unlike Shapley's use of RR Lyrae stars with the Milky Way?  Thank you in advance!
Read 1155 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
9 years ago
Hubble had managed to locate Cepheids in the arms of M31 (Andromeda) and M33 (Triangulum). He was unable to resolve these galaxy's central regions, or indeed any stars from population II. Hubble’s observational restriction to population I Cepheids would have important ramifications when Shapley’s error was later discovered. Nevertheless, when, "A spiral nebula as a stellar system, Messier 33" was finally published, Hubble estimated it to be at a distance of 263 kpc (Hubble 1926). He also showed that M31 (Andromeda) lay at a similar huge distance, and was more than twice the diameter of M33.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  734 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 8682
  
 227
  
 771
Your Opinion
What's your favorite math subject?
Votes: 315

Previous poll results: Who's your favorite biologist?