× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
New Topic  
Jermain_ Jermain_
wrote...
On Hiatus
Posts: 6410
12 years ago
Why do environmentalists such as Paul Ehrlich view unchecked population growth as a problem?
Read 4214 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
Donated
Trusted Member
12 years ago
Environmentalists recognize that much of Earth's natural capital cannot be effectively replaced. Land area is one of these. We cannot expand Earth, increasing its surface area to accommodate an unlimited population. Overpopulation also leads to degradation of natural systems and loss of biodiversity. We cannot always devise a prosthesis for lost ecosystem services and cannot replicate the exact function of missing species in ecosystems. Lost species may perform vital ecosystem services, such as pollination, and also have educational, aesthetic, or medicinal value that is irreplaceable.
 
While Ehrlich's predictions of the 1960s have not fully materialized in the 2000s the fact remains that many ecosystem services are in a state of decline, and despite the view of some Cornucopian economists that we can safely ignore his warnings, the pressure of a growing population on essential resources and biodiversity remains unmistakable.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1197 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 1025
  
 1170
  
 2586
Your Opinion
Which country would you like to visit for its food?
Votes: 204