(Solved) The United States Indian policy after 1790 is called contradictory. Why?

The United States Indian policy after 1790 is often referred to as contradictory due to its inconsistent and conflicting approaches towards Native American tribes. On one hand, there were efforts to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream American society through policies such as the Indian Removal Act of 1830 and the establishment of Indian boarding schools. These initiatives aimed to forcibly relocate Native American tribes from their ancestral lands to reservations and to eradicate their cultural identities through education and conversion to Christianity.
On the other hand, there were periods of negotiation and recognition of Native American sovereignty, as seen in treaties and agreements made between the federal government and various tribes. These agreements recognized tribal rights to land and self-governance to some extent, although they were often violated or ignored by the government when it served their interests.
Overall, the contradictory nature of US Indian policy stems from the coexistence of assimilationist efforts with policies of removal, displacement, and exploitation, leading to significant harm and injustice inflicted upon Native American communities while also recognizing their autonomy and rights in certain contexts.

Home Search Q & A Board Gallery Resource Library Blog Dictionary Chat	Quick Links Start a Topic Latest Topics Unanswered Questions Courses Study Tools Browse by Textbook	Social Facebook YouTube Community Stats Who's Online Trending Staff	Help About Us Take the Tour Study Tips Posting Guidelines Terms and Policies Contact Us
Biology Forums - Study Force © 2010-2024 \| Powered by SMF \| SMF © 2015, Simple Machines \| Sitemap Biology-Forums.com is not affiliated with any publisher. Book covers, title and author names appear for reference only.

The United States Indian policy after 1790 is called contradictory. Why?

Out of Many: A History of the American People

Related Topics