× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
g
2
2
1
New Topic  
irina irina
wrote...
Posts: 919
12 years ago
If the frequency of the genotypes change shouldn't we expect the frequency of the alleles to change?
Read 739 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
12 years ago
A potential bias in estimation of inbreeding depression when using pedigree relationships to assess the degree of homozygosity for loci under selection is indicated. A comparison of inbreeding coefficients based on either pedigree or genotypic frequencies indicated that, as a result of selection, the inbreeding coefficient based on pedigree might not correspond with the random drift of allelic frequencies. Apparent differences in average levels of both inbreeding coefficients were obtained depending on the genetic model (additive versus dominance, initial allelic frequencies, heritability) and the selection system assumed (no versus mass selection). In the absence of selection, allelic frequencies within a small population change over generations due to random drift, and the pedigree-based inbreeding coefficient gives a proper assessment of the accompanying probability of increased homozygosity within a replicate by indicating the variance of allelic frequencies over replicates. With selection, in addition to random drift, directional change in allelic frequencies is not accounted for by the pedigree-based inbreeding coefficient. This result implies that estimation of inbreeding depression for traits under either direct or indirect selection, estimated by a regression of performance on pedigree-based coefficients, should be carefully interpreted.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1719 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 422
  
 400
  
 379
Your Opinion
Where do you get your textbooks?
Votes: 806