Top Posters
Since Sunday
p
4
h
4
c
4
d
3
3
c
3
t
3
u
3
A
3
B
3
j
3
s
3
New Topic  
Conceptual Conceptual
wrote...
Posts: 1128
Rep: 4 0
7 years ago
Mills (1958) had elementary school children compete for attractive prizes. The children could cheat to win the prizes, but they didn’t know that the experimenter would be assured of detecting the cheaters. Some children cheated, and others did not. The next day,
a.   none of the students endorsed cheating as acceptable.
b.   those who had cheated earlier became more lenient in their attitudes about cheating.
c.   those who didn’t cheat earlier became more lenient in their attitudes about cheating.
d.   when they were offered a large inducement to cheat, most students cheated.
Textbook 
Social Psychology

Social Psychology


Edition: 8th
Authors:
Read 284 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
sleepersleeper
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1496
7 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

Conceptual Author
wrote...

7 years ago
Smart ... Thanks!
wrote...

Yesterday
Brilliant
wrote...

2 hours ago
this is exactly what I needed
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1076 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 4476
  
 21
  
 570
Your Opinion
How often do you eat-out per week?
Votes: 81