Top Posters
Since Sunday
p
4
h
4
c
4
d
3
3
c
3
t
3
u
3
A
3
B
3
j
3
s
3
New Topic  
Shiroח Shiroח
wrote...
Posts: 1078
Rep: 0 0
7 years ago
Why would something as apparently innocuous as a defendant’s name influence the inferences and decisions of mock jurors in the experiment by Bodenhausen (1988) mentioned in the text?
a.   Negative out-group stereotypes were activated, and they biased information processing.
b.   Group polarization during deliberations made stereotypes more extreme.
c.   Groups were more likely than individuals to commit the ultimate attribution error.
d.   Names are often a criterion used to establish minimal in-groups and out-groups.
Read 304 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
sleepersleeper
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1496
7 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Shiroח Author
wrote...

7 years ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
wrote...

Yesterday
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
wrote...

2 hours ago
You make an excellent tutor!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1157 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 4477
  
 760
  
 204
Your Opinion
Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?
Votes: 820