(Solved) How do clinicians tell one cardiac dysrhythmia from another. Seems too complicated.?

leiechizen

wrote...

Go to Answer

Posts: 10

Rep:

11 years ago

How do clinicians tell one cardiac dysrhythmia from another. Seems too complicated.?

How to tell apart ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and atrial flutter when you're actually listening to the heart sounds? Gosh, any insight will be helpful here.

Read 498 times

5 Replies

Report

Replies

Juggernaut

wrote...

11 years ago

Ok. There's some confusion here.

Most of the dysrhymia s are detected by EKG, some of the ones you mention are actually life threatening (v-fib, unstable v-tach) and the patient will likely be pulseless or in extremis at best.

A-fib can be detected with a fair degree of certainty by feeling or hearing a very irregular pulse. This is confirmed by EKG. A-flutter often presents as tachycardia and prompts an EKG, otherwise you are very unlikely to detect it.

When you listen or auscultate the heart, you are listening for valvular or ventricular (e.g. S3 in an MI) dysfunction which manifests itself as changes in the sounds heard.

The normal healthy person has an S1 and an S2 heart sound.

Abnormalities include friction rubs, gallops (S3 and S4), murmurs, and clicks. The actual interpretation of these is a little too complex to detail here so see the second source (which also has some detailed explanations).

1 Vote

nitchocolate

Report

Answer accepted by topic starter

ilove222

wrote...

Posts: 20

Rep:

11 years ago

This verified answer contains over 140 words.

1 Vote

Kellmar

Report

Related Topics

Smitty4

wrote...

11 years ago

Some can be distinguished clinically. For example atrial fibrillation/flutter can be distinguished from ventricular tachycardia because not every atrial contraction gets transmitted through the AV node, so the pulse will be different from the heart sounds. VFib usually won't have any heart sounds because there isn't enough of an organized contraction to open or close the valves. But in general, an EKG is necessary to tell exactly what's going on.

Report

fire4830

wrote...

11 years ago

well, they do sound different. But auscultating a heart dysrythmia is not the best/most accurate way, and in fact, not the usual way to diagnose a cardiac arrhythmia.

EKG is the tool of choice.

the EKG machine itself can even give a preliminary diagnosis.

Report

NavyGirl

wrote...

11 years ago

EKG's and watching the pts heart on the telemetry monitor give the best indication of the heart rhythm. It can be confusing, but taking a good course and/or using a good text, like ECG Workout by lippincott, really help to distinguish between the different rhythms and understanding what is happening in the heart. I learned so much more by using this book than I ever did in school! Good luck.

Report

New Topic

Home Search Q & A Board Gallery Resource Library Blog Dictionary Chat	Quick Links Start a Topic Latest Topics Unanswered Questions Courses Study Tools Browse by Textbook	Social Facebook YouTube Community Stats Who's Online Trending Staff	Help About Us Take the Tour Study Tips Posting Guidelines Terms and Policies Contact Us
Biology Forums - Study Force © 2010-2024 \| Powered by SMF \| SMF © 2015, Simple Machines \| Sitemap Biology-Forums.com is not affiliated with any publisher. Book covers, title and author names appear for reference only.