Top Posters
Since Sunday
New Topic  
Cadish Cadish
wrote...
Posts: 694
Rep: 7 0
6 years ago
The King Surety Company wrote a general fidelity bond covering defalcations by the employees of Wilson, Inc. Thereafter, Cooney, an employee of Wilson, embezzled $17,200 of company funds. When the activities were discovered, King paid Wilson the full amount in accordance with the terms of the fidelity bond, and then sought recovery against Wilson's auditors, Lynch & Merritt, public accountants. Which of the following would be Lynch & Merritt's best defence?
A) King is not in privity of contract.
B) The shortages were the result of clever forgeries and collusive fraud which would not be detected by an examination made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
C) Lynch & Merritt were not guilty either of negligence or fraud.
D) Lynch & Merritt were not aware of the King-Wilson surety relationship.
Textbook 
Auditing: The Art and Science of Assurance Engagements, Canadian Edition

Auditing: The Art and Science of Assurance Engagements, Canadian Edition


Edition: 12th
Authors:
Read 68 times
1 Reply
Auditing: The Art and Science of Assurance Engagements, Twelfth Canadian Edition, 12/E (Arens, Elder, Beasley, Splettstoesser)
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
inthe80sinthe80s
wrote...
Posts: 475
Rep: 6 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

Cadish Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
wrote...

Yesterday
this is exactly what I needed
wrote...

2 hours ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1264 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 701
  
 147
  
 421
Your Opinion
What's your favorite funny biology word?
Votes: 328