× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
e
5
R
5
e
4
4
d
4
o
3
p
3
t
3
3
m
3
p
3
m
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
ferg ferg
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 607
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Star-Kist Foods, Inc v. United States, Star-Kist complained that the president's authority under the Reciprocal Trade Agreement Act of 1934 was unconstitutional. Star-Kist sought to challenge a presidentially lowered tariff on canned tuna imported from Iceland. Which of the following statements are true?
 A) Star-Kist won because the congressional delegation of authority was vague and indefinite as to the policies or objectives sought.
 B) Star-Kist won because of the lack of a standard or intelligible principle upon which presidential action could be judged.
 C) Star-Kist lost because they lacked standing to protest the president's action; only Congress could object by means of a concurrent resolution.
 D) Star-Kist lost because the court determined that the 1934 statute had provided a sufficiently discernible standard to guide presidential action.
Read 349 times
4 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
BlackfireluvBlackfireluv
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 679
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

wrote...
#2
4 years ago
Thank you.
wrote...
#3
4 years ago
Thank you
wrote...
#4
3 years ago
Thank you
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  974 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 93
  
 874
  
 763
Your Opinion
Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?
Votes: 820
Previous poll results: What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?