× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
y
2
s
2
2
a
1
w
1
w
1
i
1
m
1
s
1
c
1
k
1
1
New Topic  
BrendanOO7 BrendanOO7
wrote...
Posts: 260
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
After first controlling for the effects of age, race, gender, union status, and location on earnings, suppose that a researcher estimates the rate of return to an additional year of schooling to be 8%. Note that the researcher did not control for unobserved differences in individual cognitive ability.  Why is failure to control for cognitive ability among individuals in the sample a potential problem for the credibility of the researcher's estimate of the rate of return to schooling?
Textbook 
Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy

Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy


Edition: 12th
Authors:
Read 65 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
Cognitive ability and years of schooling are likely positively correlated.  Higher ability may translate into greater labor market productivity and therefore above average earnings. By not holding constant for cognitive ability in the analysis, it's entirely possible that at least some of the observed 8% rate of return is, in reality, a return to cognitive ability rather than to additional education.  If this is the case, then the rate of return estimate exaggerates  (there is upward bias) the effect of schooling on earnings.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1059 People Browsing
 160 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 81
  
 223
  
 537
Your Opinion
Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?
Votes: 820

Previous poll results: How often do you eat-out per week?