× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
4
n
3
j
3
o
2
x
2
c
2
2
p
2
n
2
3
2
C
2
z
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities History
New Topic  
tjrwnghks3 tjrwnghks3
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 1014
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In the Dred Scott case, the Supreme Court ruled in part that
 
  a. Dred Scott was no longer a slave after living in free-soil areas for five years.
  b. as a black slave, Dred Scott was not a citizen and therefore could not legally sue in a federal court.
  c. the three-fifths compromise was unconstitutional.
  d. Congress had no power to ban the international slave trade.
  e. only free blacks had civil rights.
Read 89 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
haydenpchaydenpc
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1198
Rep: 3 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

tjrwnghks3 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Helped a lot
klyn
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
Jodias
wrote...

2 hours ago
Brilliant ツ
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1050 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 871
  
 303
  
 291
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 431
Previous poll results: Where do you get your textbooks?