× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
s
3
v
3
p
3
m
2
s
2
d
2
N
2
d
2
e
2
s
2
s
2
e
2
New Topic  
billybob3 billybob3
wrote...
Posts: 602
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Hustler v. Falwell the Supreme Court limited claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from harsh parodies in the media by ruling that
 
  a. the plaintiff must prove that physical illness resulted.
  b. the defendant must have acted with the intent to cause emotional distress.
  c. public figures must show that the offensive communication alleged facts and was published with actual malice.
  d. there must be outrageous or highly offensive conduct, as judged by a reasonable person of average sensibilities.
Read 45 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
weissdweissd
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1666
Rep: 6 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

billybob3 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This site is awesome
wrote...

Yesterday
Good timing, thanks!
wrote...

2 hours ago
Smart ... Thanks!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1542 People Browsing
 163 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 905
  
 784
  
 1170
Your Opinion
What's your favorite coffee beverage?
Votes: 303