Ok, let me tell you in detail,
1, in your mind only actual science is science.
Your idea of science is very limited, I hope you open your mind for science.
2, your view about physics is different from the view of Einstein‘s.
Einstein believes physics should be the same everywhere in the same universe, your idea is physics on earth is different from beyond earth. If you think the living condition on earth is different from beyond earth, I agree.
3, your claim is only in ideal condition, not in actual condition.
Linking an action with a reaction is right only in ideal condition, in actual condition, an action may link with many reactions, or many actions with one reaction.
4, so, delusional sensation is meaningful to actual existence.
Delusional sensations are very meaningful to actual existence if they are understood properly, and even a key for a new science. So, never look down upon delusional being.
In summary, your first claim is in contradiction with your third claim.
for science in your mind is only actual, so the conclusion from ideal condition should be kept a distance from your idea of science.
Science is all about two groups: the experimental group and the control group. I don't know how this contradicts my first statement
Your claim about science here is farther limited. What you said is only about the biological experiment, is not for general scientific principle.
I suggest you read something about science more than biology, and do not use the word science replace the word biology.