× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
New Topic  
Ptelwa Ptelwa
wrote...
Posts: 560
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Liesl purchased an insurance policy on her house. The policy stated that the insurance company was not liable for any damage to her house caused by vandalism or burglary. After Liesl's house had been vacant for more than 30 days, an arsonist burned it down. Is the insurance company liable?
 a. No, because arson is a form of vandalism.
  b. Yes, because arson is not a form of vandalism.
  c. No, because the language is ambiguous and should be interpreted against the insurance company.
  d. Yes, because the language is vague and should be interpreted against Liesl.
Read 68 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
tdubb1992tdubb1992
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1171
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Ptelwa Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Good timing, thanks!
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
wrote...

2 hours ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1120 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 36
  
 180
  
 809
Your Opinion
What's your favorite math subject?
Votes: 293