In Caterpillar Logistics Services v. Solis, where an employee claimed to suffer an on-the-job ...

In Caterpillar Logistics Services v. Solis, where an employee claimed to suffer an on-the-job injury, but Caterpillar's experts said the problem was from a preexisting condition, but OSHA (Department of Labor) held that it was a work injury, the court of appeals held that:,
 a. federal courts have no authority to review OSHA findings on injuries
  b. the decision of the administrative law judge was not reasonable because it failed to consider qualified expert testimony offered by Caterpillar
  c. the decision of the administrative law judge was properly based on scientific evidence provided by OSHAexperts
 d. the decision of the administrative law judge was not severe enough under the OSHA guidelines, so the fine imposed was tripled
  e. none of the other choices