× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
skebart skebart
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 564
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In U.S. SEC v. Ginsburg the appeals court held that Ginsburg was not guilty of insider trading because he did not trade on information; his relatives traded on information, so they could be prosecuted.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Read 47 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
gomezagomeza
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1071
Rep: 6 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

skebart Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
annielin111
wrote...

Yesterday
This calls for a celebration Person Raising Both Hands in Celebration
macbookpro1
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1215 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 356
  
 285
  
 297
Your Opinion
What's your favorite funny biology word?
Votes: 328
Previous poll results: Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?