× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
ahlea1 ahlea1
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 633
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In SEC v. Ginsburg, Ginsburg was CEO of a company that merged with another company, and he told his relatives that the merger might occur. Knowing that the stock price might then rise, the relatives bought stock in the company and profited. Ginsburg was prosecuted by the SEC for insider trading. The appeals court held that:
 a. there was not enough evidence to reasonably permit the inference that Ginsburg conveyed nonpublic information to his family members, so he was not liable for securities fraud
  b. Ginsburg did not use the information himself so there was no fraud
  c. Ginsburg did not have a fiduciary obligation to the company, so could not be guilty of insider trading
  d. Ginsburg had a fiduciary obligation to the company, but his conduct could not be proven to have violated it e. none of the other choices are correct
Read 25 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
CzarnicholasCzarnicholas
wrote...
#1
Posts: 220
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

ahlea1 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
You make an excellent tutor!
bioc
wrote...

Yesterday
Helped a lot
Transonic
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks for your help!!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1072 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 127
  
 192
  
 193
Your Opinion
Which industry do you think artificial intelligence (AI) will impact the most?
Votes: 352
Previous poll results: What's your favorite math subject?